AI · AIOps · MLOps
Your Monitoring Tells You What Broke.
Ours Tells You Before It Does.
Most DevOps teams are reactive. An alert fires, an engineer looks into it, the incident is resolved. AIOps and MLOps change the pattern — detecting anomalies before they become outages, and automating ML model delivery with the same CI/CD rigour your engineering team already applies to application code.
No retainers · NDA before any technical discussion · 30-minute call, no pitch deck
Two different problems,
both solved in the same engagement.
Intelligence applied to DevOps operations
AIOps uses machine learning on your observability data — logs, metrics, traces — to detect anomalies before they cause incidents, reduce alert noise, correlate failure signals across services, and in some cases trigger automated remediation. The output is fewer incidents and faster resolution when incidents do occur, not just better dashboards to look at.
DevOps rigour applied to ML model delivery
MLOps takes the CI/CD and IaC practices that work well for application code and applies them to machine learning models — versioned training, automated validation, reproducible environments, and one-click deployment from experiment to production. Models stop living in notebooks and start being delivered like software. Data drift and performance degradation are caught before they affect users.
What changes after an AIOps or MLOps engagement
What we build
AIOps and MLOps capabilities, together or separately
AIOps
MLOps
Published case study
MLOps Pipeline for a US Medical Technology Company Building AI-Driven Cancer Detection
A US-based medical technology company developing AI-driven cancer detection products was releasing ML models slowly and inconsistently. Each release required manual steps across environments with no repeatable process, no version control on models, and no audit trail — a significant problem in a regulated medical device context where FDA requirements apply to AI model lifecycle management. We built a GitHub Actions-based CI/CD pipeline that automates the full model release process: training validation, environment consistency checks, version registration, and one-click deployment to production. Model release time dropped by over 50%. Every deployment now produces a complete, auditable record of the model version, training data, and validation results.
What the client said
Before this engagement, releasing a model meant two days of coordination, manual checks, and hoping nothing had drifted between environments. Now it’s a single pipeline run with a complete audit trail we can hand to a regulator. Stonetusker understood both the ML side and the compliance requirements — that combination is rare.
VP of Engineering US Medical Technology Company
The engagement
How we build intelligence into an existing DevOps setup
We identify your data sources and define what “normal” looks like
AIOps requires enough observability data to train on. MLOps requires an understanding of your current model training and deployment process. The engagement starts by mapping what data you have, what’s missing, and where anomalies would be most valuable to catch early. We sign an NDA before this starts. Your model architectures, training data, and operational patterns stay confidential.
We design predictive models or MLOps pipelines around your actual environment
AIOps anomaly detection models are trained on your specific metrics — not generic thresholds. MLOps pipelines are designed around your actual model types, frameworks, and deployment targets. Nothing is a template applied without adaptation. Your engineers review the design before we build it.
We integrate into your existing CI/CD and observability stack
AIOps layers over your existing monitoring. MLOps extends your existing CI/CD pipeline. Neither requires a wholesale replacement of what’s already working. Your engineers stay involved throughout so they understand the new systems and can maintain them independently.
We validate under real conditions before handing over
Anomaly detection models are calibrated against real traffic patterns. MLOps pipelines are tested with real model releases. Alert thresholds are tuned to minimise false positives while catching real signals. We don’t hand over an AI integration that’s only been tested against synthetic data.
Models improve over time — and we set up the loops to make that happen
AIOps models improve as they see more of your incident patterns. MLOps pipelines trigger retraining as production data evolves. Continuous learning is designed in from the start, not added later. Runbooks for model updates, retraining triggers, and drift responses are delivered before we step back.
One use case. Your data. Working results in 2 to 3 weeks.
A paid pilot that delivers a working AIOps anomaly detection model or a functioning MLOps deployment pipeline for one model — on your actual stack, not a sandbox. You see the result before committing to the full engagement.
Pilot guarantee
If the pilot doesn’t deliver a working result on your actual data, you don’t pay for the full engagement.
The pilot produces a real, operating model or pipeline — on your actual observability data or your actual model stack, not on synthetic data or a demo environment. If it doesn’t, you don’t pay for the next phase. That’s in the agreement before the pilot starts.
Questions about AI in DevOps
Yes — and most of the teams we work with don’t have dedicated data scientists either. AIOps doesn’t require your engineers to become ML practitioners. We build, train, and calibrate the models. Your team operates the resulting system through the same monitoring and alerting interfaces they already use, with better signals coming out of them. For MLOps, the same applies — if you have engineers who ship models (even if they call themselves data engineers or software engineers), we build the pipeline infrastructure around their existing workflow.
Well-tuned static alerts are good — but they only fire when something crosses a threshold you’ve already anticipated. AIOps detects patterns that don’t match your normal baseline, even when they haven’t crossed a threshold. A memory leak that’s growing slowly. A latency pattern that’s slightly unusual at 3am on a Tuesday. A combination of metrics that individually look fine but together predict a failure in the next six hours. The main practical benefit for teams with good alerting is noise reduction — correlating related alerts so on-call engineers get one actionable signal instead of thirty redundant ones during an incident.
This is the core of the medical technology case study and something we’ve designed for specifically. MLOps pipelines can generate the audit trail that regulators require — every training run logged with its dataset version, every model validated against defined acceptance criteria before promotion, every deployment recorded with a timestamp and the identity of what triggered it. Compliance evidence is produced automatically through the pipeline, not assembled manually before an audit. For FDA-regulated AI, ISO 13485, or financial services AI governance, we scope the compliance requirements into the pipeline architecture from the start. It’s significantly harder to add after the fact.
Your next incident has already started producing signals.
30 minutes. We arrive having looked at your current observability and deployment setup and we’ll tell you exactly where AIOps or MLOps would have the most impact first — and what the pilot would look like.
No retainers · No lock-in · NDA signed before we discuss your architecture or model pipeline
30-minute call · No pitch deck · We come prepared for your specific observability and ML stack
Not ready yet? Get your free DevOps health score with TuskerGauge™ →