Baseline losses (per year)
Automation model (auto‑calculates expected gains)
Starter: Basic CI/CD pipeline + monitoring. Quickest to implement, lowest risk.
Standard: CI/CD + Infrastructure-as-Code + guardrails + observability. Typical 6–9 month payback.
Advanced: Platform engineering with self-service, paved roads, cost controls. Strongest long-term gains.
Investment costs (Year 1)
Assumptions & notes
Common questions about DevOps ROI
The questions engineering and finance leaders ask before making the business case.
How much does DevOps automation typically save per year?
Based on DORA benchmarks, a Standard automation level (CI/CD + IaC + observability) reduces downtime losses by 50%, developer toil by 40%, and cloud waste by 25%. For a team of 10 engineers at $120/hr loaded cost spending 6 hours/week on toil, that is roughly $150,000 in annual savings before cloud and downtime benefits.
What is the typical payback period for a DevOps engagement?
A Standard engagement typically reaches payback in 6–9 months. Stonetusker's 90-day pilot-first model is designed so most engagements reach positive ROI before the engagement ends. TuskerGain calculates your specific payback period from your actual baseline and investment costs.
What inputs do I need to run this calculator?
Five inputs from your existing tools: (1) revenue loss per outage hour, (2) outage hours per year, (3) number of engineers in releases, (4) manual toil hours per engineer per week, and (5) monthly cloud spend. The calculator applies industry-standard reduction benchmarks automatically — no guesswork required.
What is the difference between Starter, Standard and Advanced?
Starter: basic CI/CD + monitoring, 30% downtime reduction, quickest to implement. Standard: CI/CD + IaC + observability, 50% downtime reduction, 6–9 month payback. Advanced: full platform engineering with self-service platforms and cost controls, 70% downtime reduction, strongest long-term gains. Stonetusker delivers all three in fixed 90-day engagements.
Are the benchmark percentages conservative or optimistic?
Conservative. The percentages are based on published DORA data and Stonetusker's own engagement results across 16 industries. The Starter level represents the lower bound of what most basic automation implementations achieve. The Advanced level matches outcomes from full platform engineering engagements including Stonetusker's embedded and SaaS case studies.
How do I make this defensible for a CFO or board?
Use only inputs you can source from real data: your monitoring tool for outage hours, your cloud console for monthly spend, a short team survey for toil hours. Add context in the Notes section explaining each source. TuskerGain exports a clean text summary ready for a slide or email. Stonetusker can also validate your assumptions in a free 30-minute architecture review.